I've begun to study for the CSET in Social Sciences, and apparently I don't know anything about US history. I was busy outlining broad themes -- movements/eras, political thought and development, wars, religion and philosophy, etc. -- when I thought, "Since several of my classmates are also preparing for the test, why not post this outline as a wiki?"
As I was listing wars, I thought, "Hmm...maybe I should check Wikipedia to make sure I'm not skipping anything." When I looked at the US history page, I found that it was organized in exactly the way I wanted. Not only was the information divided chronologically, but thematically.
Wikipedia is the first place I go for quick or general answers. Why is it, then, that I've only heard negative comments about it for use by students? Sure, it's possible that the information is unreliable, and citations are a bitch. But, in general, I think it's a great tool for studying, quick answers, finding relationships between topics, etc.
Wikipedia is also saving me like 75 bucks on review books.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
i don't care other people say, I love me my Wiki...btw I couldn't help but giggle at the title...I'm reminded of that classic Looking Glass song, "Brandy (You're a Fine Girl)" ...Wiki, what a good wife you would be!
Post a Comment